Received: from relay5.UU.NET (relay5.UU.NET [192.48.96.15]) by keeper.albany.net (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id LAA18664 for <dwarner@albany.net>; Tue, 12 Dec 1995 11:13:41 -0500 (EST)
Received: from garcia.com by relay5.UU.NET with SMTP
id QQztuu03039; Tue, 12 Dec 1995 11:06:08 -0500 (EST)
Received: from (localhost) by garcia.com (5.x/SMI-SVR4)
id AA21937; Tue, 12 Dec 1995 11:06:30 -0500
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 1995 11:06:30 -0500
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Message-Id: <30CD907D@HUB.DHR.STATE.NC.US>
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Reply-To: lightwave@garcia.com
Originator: lightwave@garcia.com
Sender: lightwave@garcia.com
Precedence: bulk
From: Bob Andersen <BANDERSEN@DIRM.DHR.STATE.NC.US>
To: Multiple recipients of list <lightwave@garcia.com>
Subject: 060 speeds
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Status: RO
X-Status:
VTU and LW PRO printed rendering performance tests about 5-6 issues ago. As
far as I can remember:
The 060 is about 4-5 times faster than a 25mhz 040.
A pentium 100 is about 9-10 times faster than a 25mhz 040.
The highest end Alphas were about 40 times faster than a 25mhz 040.
I've read that if Lightwave were compiled on a 060-specific compiler it
would run faster (on a 060). Does anyone know:
Is Newtek working on a 060-compiled version?
How much faster would a 060-compiled version be than the 040-compiled